The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on a case deciding the future of campaign finance — these are the standout moments.

Brennan Center for Justice Elections and Government Program Director Daniel Weiner talked about the Supreme Court oral arguments in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election ...

A legal fight could restore the state’s power to set its own limits on contributions to super PACs and encourage public financing.

In practice, that has meant more expert, technocratic leadership. It has meant more corporate regulation than Republicans ...

The shadow docket, on the other hand, enables the high court to decide on urgent, major issues quickly by bypassing full ...

The court could also side with the NRSC and Republicans and strike down the coordinated spending limits – a move that would amount to one of the biggest changes in campaign finance law since the ...

You'll get access to an ad-free website with a faster photo browser, the chance to claim free tickets to a host of events ...

Republicans are looking to the justices to remove a key campaign finance restriction. Most of the court’s right-wing majority ...

Spending on statewide elections has grown substantially in part because of an overhaul of Wisconsin's campaign finance laws ...

Updated on Dec. 10 at 10:37 a.m. The Supreme Court on Tuesday considered a challenge to a federal law limiting the amount of ...

The court appears likely to issue a ruling notwithstanding arguments that the case is moot because of Vance's equivocation ...

Caps on election spending may become a thing of the past. Supreme Court is considering a Republican-led drive, backed by ...